Reporting Lines for the Company Secretary
Reporting Lines for the Company Secretary
David Cantrick-Brooks | 01/05/2025

In a recent post on LinkedIn (and an expanded follow-up article) we asked WHAT DO BOARDS REALLY WANT FROM THE COMPANY SECRETARY?

In this article, we ask WHO SHOULD THE COMPANY SECRETARY REPORT TO?

Reporting lines for the company secretary vary from organisation to organisation and may include the one of the following:

The reporting line could depend upon the following factors:

Regardless of the reporting line it is very important that the company secretary is independent and can act independently, to facilitate / promote good governance, without fear of reprisal/s if management disagrees with some action proposed or rightly taken by the company secretary.

Comments and feedback is invited from directors, company secretaries and other interested stakeholders.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

The Corporations Act at 25: Still Fit for Purpose – or Overdue for Reform?

At 25, Australia’s Corporations Act remains indispensable – but has it become unnecessarily complicated? This article assesses its achievements, the causes and costs of legislative complexity, the ALRC’s reform agenda and the difference between changes already enacted and proposals still awaiting implementation. It argues for careful, evidence-based reform that makes corporate law clearer and more proportionate without sacrificing investor protection, accountability or market confidence.

11/09/2026

The Hidden Governance System: Why Management Committees Need Rules Too

Management committees can strengthen decision-making by bringing relevant expertise and challenge into important operational matters. But they can also create bureaucracy, delay decisions and obscure accountability. This article examines when management committees are worthwhile, how their authority should be defined, what the board needs to know, and the practical disciplines that help them work effectively. The central question is not how many committees an organisation has, but whether each committee improves decisions, manages risks and maintains clear responsibility for results.

10/31/2026

Proposed Reporting Threshold Changes: Implications for Australian Companies and Climate Reporting

The Australian Government has proposed significant increases to the financial thresholds used to classify large proprietary companies under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). From financial years commencing on or after 1 July 2027, the consolidated revenue threshold would double from $50 million to $100 million, while the consolidated gross assets threshold would increase from $25 million to $50 million. The employee threshold would remain unchanged. Although intended to reduce corporate reporting burdens, the proposals seem to have broader implications for Australia's mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime. In particular, some entities previously expecting to commence Group 3 sustainability reporting in July 2027 may no longer meet the applicable reporting thresholds. Importantly, the potential consequences extend beyond proprietary companies to certain non-charitable public companies limited by guarantee. This Governance Briefing looks at the proposed changes, their interaction with the Corporations Act, and the practical implications for directors, company secretaries, CFOs and governance professionals.

10/30/2026