
What do boards really want from the Company Secretary?
This article outlines and questions what boards want from the company secretary, noting the various factors and competing forces.
In a recent post on LinkedIn (and an expanded follow-up article) we asked WHAT DO BOARDS REALLY WANT FROM THE COMPANY SECRETARY?
In this article, we ask WHO SHOULD THE COMPANY SECRETARY REPORT TO?
Reporting lines for the company secretary vary from organisation to organisation and may include the one of the following:
The reporting line could depend upon the following factors:
Regardless of the reporting line it is very important that the company secretary is independent and can act independently, to facilitate / promote good governance, without fear of reprisal/s if management disagrees with some action proposed or rightly taken by the company secretary.
Comments and feedback is invited from directors, company secretaries and other interested stakeholders.
This article outlines and questions what boards want from the company secretary, noting the various factors and competing forces.
This article outlines the requirements for, and merits of, conducting periodic external (independent) governance reviews by an experienced external consultant. Here, it is suggested that independent governance reviews should be undertaken periodically - around every 3 years - as a matter of good corporate governance.
Law makers, regulators and courts will face many challenges in applying existing laws, rules and regulations to the use of AI in business, including in the context of directors’ duties, although not forgetting the many other areas that have and will be significantly impacted by AI. This short article seeks to explore and outline several key factors that ought to be considered by all such bodies and authorities in response to the rapid adoption and use of AI by organisations, potentially as part of a broader law reform program. Understandably, it will take some time for laws, rules and regulations to catch up and sensibly respond to technological innovation in this area – to protect the genuine interests of relevant stakeholders, but without stifling innovation.