
Why do boards struggle to rein in late and lengthy papers?
This article outlines some of the factors and reasons why boards may find it difficult to rein in late and lengthy board papers (including those of poor quality).
In a recent post on LinkedIn (and an expanded follow-up article) we asked WHAT DO BOARDS REALLY WANT FROM THE COMPANY SECRETARY?
In this article, we ask WHO SHOULD THE COMPANY SECRETARY REPORT TO?
Reporting lines for the company secretary vary from organisation to organisation and may include the one of the following:
The reporting line could depend upon the following factors:
Regardless of the reporting line it is very important that the company secretary is independent and can act independently, to facilitate / promote good governance, without fear of reprisal/s if management disagrees with some action proposed or rightly taken by the company secretary.
Comments and feedback is invited from directors, company secretaries and other interested stakeholders.
General Disclaimer:
The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.
No person(s) should act, or refrain from acting, solely on the basis of the material contained on this website. Your access of this website, and any use that you may make of the information on it, is not intended to create, and your use does not constitute, a contractual relationship of any kind.
All material published by Governance in Action Pty Ltd on its website remains its property, with copyright attached, and all rights are reserved.
This article outlines some of the factors and reasons why boards may find it difficult to rein in late and lengthy board papers (including those of poor quality).
This article outlines and questions what boards want from the company secretary, noting the various factors and competing forces.
This article outlines the requirements for, and merits of, conducting periodic external (independent) governance reviews by an experienced external consultant. Here, it is suggested that independent governance reviews should be undertaken periodically - around every 3 years - as a matter of good corporate governance.