Evaluating the Performance of Your Company Secretary - Part 1
Evaluating the Performance of Your Company Secretary - Part 1
David Cantrick-Brooks | 19/07/2025

The company secretary plays a critical role in ensuring that the organisation complies with its various legal and other regulatory obligations, the board and management is well advised and properly supported in corporate governance processes, etc. (including decision-making), and the organisation is generally well governed (in terms of policies, procedures, etc.).

A company secretary’s performance can be evaluated by reference to a wide range of aspects and contributions.

For example, is your company secretary:

1 Familiarity with the organisation’s corporate structure and principal activities are essential in being effective.

2 If and when required.

3 Being a company secretary can be a very tough gig, often sandwiched between the board and management, especially where reporting lines make it difficult to serve two masters.

Governance in Action Pty Ltd can assist with designing and (if requested) conducting balanced scorecard-based performance and/or efficiency reviews of company secretaries and company secretarial functions.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

The Hidden Governance System: Why Management Committees Need Rules Too

Management committees can strengthen decision-making by bringing relevant expertise and challenge into important operational matters. But they can also create bureaucracy, delay decisions and obscure accountability. This article examines when management committees are worthwhile, how their authority should be defined, what the board needs to know, and the practical disciplines that help them work effectively. The central question is not how many committees an organisation has, but whether each committee improves decisions, manages risks and maintains clear responsibility for results.

10/31/2026

Proposed Reporting Threshold Changes: Implications for Australian Companies and Climate Reporting

The Australian Government has proposed significant increases to the financial thresholds used to classify large proprietary companies under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). From financial years commencing on or after 1 July 2027, the consolidated revenue threshold would double from $50 million to $100 million, while the consolidated gross assets threshold would increase from $25 million to $50 million. The employee threshold would remain unchanged. Although intended to reduce corporate reporting burdens, the proposals seem to have broader implications for Australia's mandatory climate-related financial disclosure regime. In particular, some entities previously expecting to commence Group 3 sustainability reporting in July 2027 may no longer meet the applicable reporting thresholds. Importantly, the potential consequences extend beyond proprietary companies to certain non-charitable public companies limited by guarantee. This Governance Briefing looks at the proposed changes, their interaction with the Corporations Act, and the practical implications for directors, company secretaries, CFOs and governance professionals.

10/30/2026

From Sustainability to Nature Reporting: What Australian Boards Need to Know

Nature reporting is emerging as the next important development in sustainability-related financial disclosure. The ISSB’s October 2026 Exposure Draft seeks more comparable information about financially material risks and opportunities arising from businesses’ interactions with nature. This article explains the international background, what is proposed, why it matters to different Australian industries and the important distinction between the proposed international guidance and Australia’s existing mandatory climate-reporting requirements. It concludes with proportionate questions for directors and governance professionals to consider without assuming that a new Australian obligation or commencement date has been announced.

10/28/2026