FINDING MEMO” (apologies to Pixar and Disney!)
FINDING MEMO” (apologies to Pixar and Disney!)
David Cantrick-Brooks | 06/12/2025

In this article David Cantrick-Brooks (Principal & Director, Governance in Action) and Christine Chan (Senior Company Secretary, Jardine Matheson, Hong Kong) explore the topic of filing systems in company secretarial practice.

We all know how frustrating and very time-consuming it can be to not find a critical document, especially one that is requested at short notice by a director or senior executive, and you have the least amount of ‘spare’ time to start looking for it!In days gone by, when documents were predominantly printed and filed in a secure compactus by an executive assistant whose job it was to keep the filing up to date, finding a document was on the whole fairly easy, providing the filing system was good and the filing kept up to date (in the right places).These days, however, with diminished budgets and resources and dramatic changes in technology, we generally no longer have documents methodically stored in hard copy form (which has some positives and negatives of course).Instead, we create and receive documents almost exclusively in soft copy form, which can present its own challenges.First, the filing system must be secure, logical and easy to use.In my experience, electronic filing systems tend to evolve over time, as people in the team come and go, each bringing their own views, preferences and interpretations of what to call something and where to file it, sometimes unwittingly giving rise to duplicate folders and documents (because someone can’t find the relevant folder and so creates another folder, not realising that one already exists somewhere else in the system), and naming documents in ways that are vague, imprecise or otherwise unhelpful, which can make the job of finding something extraordinarily difficult, time-consuming and frustrating (for everyone).Second, there needs to be discipline in following the filing instructions (for everyone’s sake – short-term and long-term), including filing things as you go along (rather than waiting until there is a quieter moment to do this seemingly less important work).Third, access to folders must be restricted to those who really need it (regardless of seniority).Fourth, the login details must be kept secure at all times.Fifth, be alive to cybersecurity issues and take appropriate precautions (including checking to see if documents contain any viruses before opening and saving them).Talk to your IT team if you are unsure.Sixth, like hard copy files, don’t forget to archive old documents appropriately.Seventh, be careful with any documents that are private and confidential and subject to legal professional privilege.Security classification can be incredibly important.Create a procedure which promotes both clarity and consistency.

It should be noted that electronic filing systems are widely recognised as being far superior to manual filing systems in many ways, as we discovered during COVID-19 (including the ease of filing and searching for documents, not to mention the massive savings in physical space and stationery-related expenses).However, I’m sure that we’ve all experienced situations where an email or document cannot be found even though we are certain it exists.This is especially true of emails and documents in Outlook, which is why dedicated document management systems are so much better.However, it’s acknowledged and accepted that most dedicated document management systems are not inexpensive, which is why so many company secretary functions use and rely upon tightly controlled shared drives and/or SharePoint (with restricted access for key stakeholders).

Be aware that filing systems should be appropriate for the current and anticipated future needs of the organisation, including how those systems interact with other systems (such as an entity management system and/or board portal, etc.).

Here are some helpful hints and tips:

If your budget permits, there are some very good off-the-shelf systems available, although they may take some time to set up.

Share your thoughts … and, if you haven’t already, please take ~5 minutes to participate in the online survey on filing systems – see LinkedIn post published on 15 November 2025:

https://lnkd.in/gqWDbK4P

Governance in Action Pty Ltd can assist clients in setting up and reviewing filing systems and processes to help ensure they are efficient and effective.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Tranche 2 AML/CTF: An Early Temperature Check for Professional Service Providers

Australia’s Tranche 2 AML/CTF reforms moved into live operation on 1 July 2026. One month later, the evidence is not strong enough for a verdict - but it is sufficient to identify the questions that matter. This article explains why scope mapping remains the first control, clarifies the significance of the 29 July enrolment deadline, and examines the shift from having policies and templates to operating an effective AML/CTF framework. It also considers the position of governance and company secretarial providers, the need to integrate customer due diligence into ordinary workflows, the interaction between recordkeeping and privacy, and the responsibilities of governing bodies, senior managers and compliance officers. The central lesson is that commencement readiness is not completion: the next phase is to test, evidence and improve how the program works in live engagements.

08/02/2026

APRA’s proposed recast CPS 510: What changes, what matters and how boards should prepare

APRA’s proposed recast CPS 510 Governance is more than a technical consolidation. It would combine five prudential standards into one cross-industry framework and impose clearer, more evidence-based expectations for board accountability, delegation, management information, skills, performance, renewal, conflicts and fitness and propriety. The most consequential proposals include a mandatory measurable board skills matrix, an independent external board review every three years for significant financial institutions, and a 12-year maximum tenure for non-executive directors. The draft also creates sharper requirements for group-board independence and board information, while reducing routine fit-and-proper reporting through alignment with the Financial Accountability Regime. This article explains the key changes, contrasts them with the draft 5th edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, and sets out a practical implementation agenda for boards, company secretaries and governance advisers. Although commencement is expected in early 2028, long-lead matters such as director succession, committee composition, constitutions, charters and systems should be identified well before the final standard takes effect.

08/01/2026

Forty Years of Director and Officer Penalties in Australia: What the Evidence Really Shows

Australia’s corporate-enforcement system has changed substantially over the four financial decades to 30 June 2026. Civil-enforcement activity and statutory penalty ceilings have increased, and recent cases demonstrate that directors and senior officers can face substantial personal penalties, lengthy disqualification and costs exposure. Yet the available public data does not prove that the underlying rate of serious misconduct has risen—or that higher financial penalties alone deter it. Headline ASIC totals are dominated by penalties imposed on companies, while director-specific research shows that disqualification and imprisonment have historically been central to individual accountability. This article separates what the evidence establishes from what remains uncertain, examines the impact of the 2019 penalty reforms, and identifies the practical lessons for boards, governance professionals and regulators.

07/29/2026