Using AI to Help Write Better Board Papers
Using AI to Help Write Better Board Papers
David Cantrick-Brooks | 21/06/2026

We all know how much time is required to write a good board paper (I am including committee papers in this) and we’ve often heard the adage: ‘I didn’t have time to write you a short letter, so I wrote you a long one instead’ (or words to that effect), often attributed to Mark Twain, although it goes back to Blaise Pascal in 1657.Regardless, both men were highlighting the same timeless truth: writing concisely is incredibly difficult. It is always faster and easier to let words spill out onto the page; editing them down into a sharp, clear, and powerful message requires significant time and effort, especially where there is a lot of data and the issues are complex.Fortunately, we have AI to call upon to help us, although we need to be very careful about confidentiality and sensitivity – internally and externally.There must be appropriate guardrails (often in the form of policies and procedures, etc.) and they need to be followed by everyone (without exception).

Directors want papers which (among other things):

You will note that the word ‘relevant’ appears frequently, which should come as no surprise.Problems with paper length can often be traced back to a lack of relevance in the content.

As a wise mentor once said to me, when writing a meeting paper always think about the WHO, WHAT, WHEN, WHERE, WHY and HOW, noting there can be many angles to consider here.

So, how can AI help with these?With well-constructed or engineered prompts, generative AI (combined with agentic AI1) can:

Diarise due dates for papers and send reminders to management.Think workflow …

Research and compile content from relevant, valid and credible internal and external sources.

Succinctly summarise and synthesise large volumes of data / information, even if it is dispersed and complex.

Construct tables, graphs, flowcharts, etc. with minimal effort.

Identify, describe and explain relationships between things.

Test assumptions, limitations and constraints under certain scenarios, including with respect to different alternatives.However, generative AI can produce inaccurate or fabricated content; the Federal Court’s 2026 AI practice note is a useful reminder that outputs may contain fictitious citations, factual errors or incorrect legal analysis.

Reference previous relevant decisions / transactions.

Populate standard templates with the required information.

Review papers for completeness, logic and accuracy (including with reference to any agreed guidelines / instructions to authors of papers or any specific requirements).

Edit papers according to certain guidelines (including tone and style).

Call out issues requiring further thought / attention.

Tidy up papers ready for publication.

Create handy summaries for directors.

Identify emerging themes and issues within a meeting pack for directors, which might otherwise be missed.

Create draft ‘skeleton’ or ‘shell’ minutes and run sheet from the papers in the meeting pack for the company secretary.

Assign responsibilities in respect of pre-approval sign-offs and post-approval actions.Again, think workflow …

Send reminders to those responsible for post-meeting actions.

Provide inputs into the meeting cycle (including, for example, additions to the annual workplan).

IMPORTANT: This list is not exhaustive (simply illustrative).

1 Note that AI can diarise, assign actions and set and send reminders only where it is properly integrated with authorised systems, configured correctly and subject to access controls.

It can take time to construct or engineer an AI prompt, but the time and effort will be worth it.I can say this from first-hand experience.

AI is an incredible tool, although we need to be very careful about confidentiality and sensitivity – even with an enterprise version.There must be appropriate guardrails (in the form of policies and procedures, etc.) and they need to be followed by everyone.Note that approved enterprise tools also require appropriate data-handling rules, user training, human review and governance controls – consistent with the Australian Government’s voluntary AI safety guardrails, which emphasise accountability, risk assessment, testing, controls and meaningful human oversight.

OAIC guidance recommends that organisations do not enter personal information, particularly sensitive information, into publicly available generative AI tools because of significant and complex privacy risks.

With deep knowledge and experience, Governance in Action can assist clients with ‘traditional’ and AI-assisted board paper writing, including prompt engineering.Governance in Action also has and can develop bespoke AI-based apps to assist clients with writing board papers.

This article has been prepared with the aid of AI. Final judgement, editing and accountability of course remain with the author.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Keeping Your Governance Records in Shape: Why Periodic Health Checks Matter

Good governance leaves a record. But when did your organisation last examine whether its governance records are complete, accurate, current, secure and genuinely fit for purpose? Governance records extend well beyond financial books and records. They include statutory registers, board and committee records, constitutions and charters, policies, director appointment and induction materials, regulatory lodgements, workplans, delegations and the systems used to create, approve, store, retrieve, retain and ultimately destroy them. A periodic independent governance health check can provide a fresh perspective on whether these records and processes remain compliant, consistent and effective. Properly scoped, such a review complements rather than duplicates the work of the company secretary, internal audit and external audit. It can also identify opportunities to simplify processes, strengthen assurance, improve information security and make responsible use of AI. This article considers what a governance health check should cover, how often one might be undertaken and why good governance hygiene increasingly requires attention to the complete lifecycle of an organisation's records.

09/19/2026

Australia's Regulatory Reform Agenda: How Boards and Executives Can Prioritise What Matters

Australian businesses are confronting an unusually crowded regulatory reform agenda. Climate reporting, privacy, AML/CTF, APRA governance reform, the fifth edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles, modern slavery, whistleblowing, cyber security and other reforms are competing for the same governance, legal, risk, technology and assurance resources. The challenge is therefore no longer simply identifying what regulation applies. Boards and executives increasingly need to govern regulatory change itself as an enterprise portfolio—prioritising what is certain, material and urgent, identifying dependencies, managing implementation capacity and avoiding unnecessary duplication.

09/14/2026

From Boardroom Adviser to Board Member: Could Company Secretaries Make Good Directors?

Could a career company secretary make a good non-executive director? The answer may be yes - provided boards look beyond job titles and assess the whole candidate. Experienced company secretaries can bring unusual boardroom fluency, governance and regulatory judgement, an enterprise-wide view of information flows and strong insight into board-management dynamics. But they may also need to demonstrate commercial depth, industry knowledge, decision ownership and the ability to move from adviser to director. This article tests the case against current Australian law, the draft 5th edition ASX Corporate Governance Principles, APRA's draft CPS 510, leading governance guidance and recent case law. It concludes that a former company secretary should not be treated as a board's “governance insurance policy” - governance remains a collective responsibility - but where governance, risk, information integrity and constructive challenge are genuine capability gaps, experienced company secretaries deserve serious consideration in board succession planning.

09/13/2026