Current Issues for Company Directors (in Australia)
Current Issues for Company Directors (in Australia)
David Cantrick-Brooks | 05/03/2025

In 2025 we are likely to see a continuation of the same issues afflicting companies in 2023-24:

Boards will need to be mindful of these when setting strategy and approving ‘defining moment’ transactions.

References

https://www.nacdonline.org/all-governance/governance-resources/governance-research/outlook-and-challenges/2025-governance-outlook/preparing-for-five-crucial-board-balancing-acts-in-2025/

https://www.governanceinstitute.com.au/news_media/a-directors-roadmap-to-2025-governance-institute-launches-board-of-the-future-report/

https://www.diligent.com/en-au/resources/blog/corporate-governance-trends

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelperegrine/2024/12/30/top-10-governance-and-leadership-trends-for-2025/

https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/news-analysis/board-planning-2025-ten-things-directors-should-think-about-now/?srsltid=AfmBOor_OFmJ7CvaCSRlD6dyI2S0DJSJFhUcaB2IhYWciywcnleEsmLu

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Rules of Thumb for Company Secretaries: Practical Wisdom or Convenient Fiction?

Company secretaries regularly rely on practical rules of thumb to manage board meetings, prepare papers, draft minutes and maintain effective governance processes. But how reliable are these familiar guidelines? Should board papers contain three, five or ten pages? Should virtual meetings outnumber face-to-face meetings two to one? And is there an ideal period between committee and board meetings? Drawing on practical experience and authoritative Australian governance guidance, this article examines the difference between useful heuristics, professional conventions, potentially misleading generalisations and binding legal requirements. It explores why persuasive evidence may be sufficient to support a practical guideline, why the familiar 80/20 principle cannot establish a rule's reliability, and how company secretaries can decide when to follow a rule of thumb — and when to depart from it. The central message: practical wisdom is valuable, but it must remain subject to professional judgment. I would also recommend internally linking the article to your existing publications on board paper preparation, agenda effectiveness, minutes and governance health checks. This would make the new article part of a coherent collection of practical governance resources.

10/17/2026

How Often Should Boards Review Their Policies? A Practical Governance Approach

How often should boards review their policies? There is no universal answer. Some policies and governance frameworks warrant annual review; others may reasonably operate on longer cycles. What matters is that review frequency reflects the importance of the policy, the organisation's risk profile, the pace of change and operational experience – and that scheduled reviews are supplemented by event-driven triggers. This article proposes a practical, risk-based approach to policy review cycles, board and committee workplans, policy registers and effective policy governance.

10/03/2026

From More Board Papers to Better Board Questions: What Telstra’s AI Agent Tells Us About the Future

Artificial intelligence may have a more important role in the boardroom than simply drafting papers, summarising reports or producing minutes. Telstra’s purpose-built Board AI agent points to a different possibility: using AI to help directors retrieve, connect and interrogate trusted board information so they can ask better questions. This article explores what that development may mean for board effectiveness, board reporting, company secretaries and the governance of AI itself – and why the objective should not be to automate board judgement, but to create more space for informed challenge, institutional memory and sound decision-making.

10/01/2026