Current Issues for Company Directors (in Australia)
Current Issues for Company Directors (in Australia)
David Cantrick-Brooks | 05/03/2025

In 2025 we are likely to see a continuation of the same issues afflicting companies in 2023-24:

Boards will need to be mindful of these when setting strategy and approving ‘defining moment’ transactions.

References

https://www.nacdonline.org/all-governance/governance-resources/governance-research/outlook-and-challenges/2025-governance-outlook/preparing-for-five-crucial-board-balancing-acts-in-2025/

https://www.governanceinstitute.com.au/news_media/a-directors-roadmap-to-2025-governance-institute-launches-board-of-the-future-report/

https://www.diligent.com/en-au/resources/blog/corporate-governance-trends

https://www.forbes.com/sites/michaelperegrine/2024/12/30/top-10-governance-and-leadership-trends-for-2025/

https://www.thecorporategovernanceinstitute.com/insights/news-analysis/board-planning-2025-ten-things-directors-should-think-about-now/?srsltid=AfmBOor_OFmJ7CvaCSRlD6dyI2S0DJSJFhUcaB2IhYWciywcnleEsmLu

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Wearing Too Many Hats: When Combined Roles Become a Governance Risk

Combining the company secretary role with legal, finance, risk, compliance, internal audit or other executive responsibilities can be efficient and commercially sensible. The governance risk arises when one role compromises the purpose, objectivity, authority, capacity or effectiveness of another. This article examines the benefits of combined roles, the legal significance of actual responsibilities, board and chair reporting lines, self-review and assurance risk, segregation of duties, conflicts, client legal privilege, workload and psychosocial hazards, investigation protocols, and key-person dependence. It also provides a practical framework for boards to test whether a multiple-role structure remains fit for purpose and to design safeguards including direct board access, documented boundaries, critical control separations, independent assurance, conflict and recusal arrangements, privilege protocols, adequate resourcing and succession planning.

07/15/2026

Boardroom Attention: Making Better Use of Limited Meeting Time

Boards face more issues, information and regulatory expectations than ever, but meeting time remains finite. The answer is not a universal strategy-versus-compliance ratio or simply scheduling longer meetings. Boards should treat attention as a governance resource and design their workplans, agendas, papers, committees and meeting cadence around the decisions, assumptions, risks and opportunities that matter most. This article examines the limits of commonly cited board-time benchmarks and offers practical ways to improve meeting effectiveness. These include classifying agenda items by purpose, moving information transfer out of the meeting, improving board papers, using committees and consent agendas carefully, strengthening between-meeting escalation, applying secure technology and AI controls, and measuring outcomes rather than meeting length. The objective is not shorter meetings at any cost. It is to convert boardroom time from passive receipt of information into disciplined judgment, challenge, assurance and foresight.

07/13/2026

Independent Board Evaluations and Governance Reviews: From Assurance to Improvement

Independent board performance evaluations and independent governance reviews can provide boards with objective insight, specialist expertise and a disciplined basis for improvement. They are related but different: a performance evaluation examines how the board, committees, chair and directors work; a governance review examines the wider structures, decision rights, information flows and accountability systems around them. This article explains the Australian legal and regulatory position, including ASX Recommendation 1.6 and APRA’s June 2026 draft CPS 510, and sets out a practical approach to scope, reviewer independence, timing, methods, secure use of technology and follow-through. Its central message is simple: the report is not the result. Value is created when findings are prioritised, responsibilities and deadlines are assigned, implementation is evidenced and later reviews test whether the intended improvement occurred.

07/11/2026