Building an Agenda – Back to Basics
Building an Agenda – Back to Basics
David Cantrick-Brooks | 27/03/2025

Agendas are a critical part of the decision-making process. One of the risks associated with building agendas is the unnecessary inclusion of items which do not actually require board attention and potentially consume time better spent on other things. Boards should review delegations of authority and charters to ensure that only items which actually require board attention are included. Boards should be focussed on the following core matters:

The front part of the agenda should include the following items:

  1. Welcome and any apologies
  2. Declarations of any changes to the register of material person interests (aka standing notice), plus any conflicts of interest that may pertain to the matters to be discussed
  3. Any late changes to the agenda (for example, as a consequence of a presenter being unavoidably delayed)

Agenda items are typically drawn from a wide range of sources, including the annual workplan, matters arising from previous minutes (aka actions register) and any specific requests received from directors and/or management.Reference to a previous agenda (at the same time of year) can be helpful, although not strictly necessary (if everything else is working as it should).

Themes in an annual board calendar could include:

* short-term and long-term

Note that the industry in which the company operates has a major bearing on agenda items – e.g. agendas for companies in the financial services industry tend to be very busy.

A board / committee meeting agenda is a roadmap for directors which outlines the items to be considered and in what order they will be discussed.It also includes the meeting's date, time, location (whether in-person, virtual or both), and the names and positions of those attending.

Committee agendas should reflect their individual charters, current workplans and prevailing issues / requests. Committees are established to assist the board by considering and making recommendations about particular matters and overseeing performance and compliance at a more granular level.All directors should not attend all committee meetings.

Allocate time for each agenda item (and stick to it!).The chair should ensure that the meeting runs smoothly and deals with all agenda items, encouraging contributions from every director (especially those who tend to be passive or reserved).

“Agenda creep”, where the agenda grows as new items are added but nothing comes off, is an issue for many boards.Boards should also be conscious of the amount of time spent looking back versus looking forward (strategy), with an emphasis on the latter.

Agendas are typically discussed and agreed between the secretary, relevant chair (board and committee), CEO and/or another responsible executive (in the case of committees).This can be a very time-consuming process and require many iterations, so start early!

The agenda-setting process can vary greatly depending on the organisation and the ways that things have been done in the past (for better or worse).Change can be difficult!

Papers should be clear and concise to ensure that the key issues are appropriately identified and addressed.More about this in a future blog.

Finally, it should be noted that agenda-building (and related) software is available to improve, streamline and automate manual processes.

NEED HELP?If you require assistance with creating an industry or sector-specific agenda for your organisation, or would like assistance to improve your current agenda(s), please contact us.We can also assist you in choosing and implementing an appropriate software solution – something appropriate for your organisation.

Additional Reading

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/b/balancedscorecard.asp

General Disclaimer:

The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice on any matter.

No person(s) should act, or refrain from acting, solely on the basis of the material contained on this website. Your access of this website, and any use that you may make of the information on it, is not intended to create, and your use does not constitute, a contractual relationship of any kind.

All material published by Governance in Action Pty Ltd on its website remains its property, with copyright attached, and all rights are reserved.

PreviousNext

Related Articles

Tranche 2 AML/CTF: An Early Temperature Check for Professional Service Providers

Australia’s Tranche 2 AML/CTF reforms moved into live operation on 1 July 2026. One month later, the evidence is not strong enough for a verdict - but it is sufficient to identify the questions that matter. This article explains why scope mapping remains the first control, clarifies the significance of the 29 July enrolment deadline, and examines the shift from having policies and templates to operating an effective AML/CTF framework. It also considers the position of governance and company secretarial providers, the need to integrate customer due diligence into ordinary workflows, the interaction between recordkeeping and privacy, and the responsibilities of governing bodies, senior managers and compliance officers. The central lesson is that commencement readiness is not completion: the next phase is to test, evidence and improve how the program works in live engagements.

08/02/2026

APRA’s proposed recast CPS 510: What changes, what matters and how boards should prepare

APRA’s proposed recast CPS 510 Governance is more than a technical consolidation. It would combine five prudential standards into one cross-industry framework and impose clearer, more evidence-based expectations for board accountability, delegation, management information, skills, performance, renewal, conflicts and fitness and propriety. The most consequential proposals include a mandatory measurable board skills matrix, an independent external board review every three years for significant financial institutions, and a 12-year maximum tenure for non-executive directors. The draft also creates sharper requirements for group-board independence and board information, while reducing routine fit-and-proper reporting through alignment with the Financial Accountability Regime. This article explains the key changes, contrasts them with the draft 5th edition of the ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations, and sets out a practical implementation agenda for boards, company secretaries and governance advisers. Although commencement is expected in early 2028, long-lead matters such as director succession, committee composition, constitutions, charters and systems should be identified well before the final standard takes effect.

08/01/2026

Forty Years of Director and Officer Penalties in Australia: What the Evidence Really Shows

Australia’s corporate-enforcement system has changed substantially over the four financial decades to 30 June 2026. Civil-enforcement activity and statutory penalty ceilings have increased, and recent cases demonstrate that directors and senior officers can face substantial personal penalties, lengthy disqualification and costs exposure. Yet the available public data does not prove that the underlying rate of serious misconduct has risen—or that higher financial penalties alone deter it. Headline ASIC totals are dominated by penalties imposed on companies, while director-specific research shows that disqualification and imprisonment have historically been central to individual accountability. This article separates what the evidence establishes from what remains uncertain, examines the impact of the 2019 penalty reforms, and identifies the practical lessons for boards, governance professionals and regulators.

07/29/2026